代码编织梦想

ICP问题

  • 迭代最近点法(ICP)可以用来求解两组三维图像(或三维点云)间的位姿变换关系。可以通过奇异值分解或非线性优化方式求解。
    关于ICP求解的推导公式均在课本第七讲。
  • 下面分别介绍SVD求解方法、自定义顶点的G2O求解方法、采用内置顶点的G2O求解方法。

SVD求解方法

void pose_estimation_3d3d (
    const vector<Point3f>& pts1,
    const vector<Point3f>& pts2,
    Mat& R, Mat& t
)
{
    Point3f p1, p2;     // center of mass
    int N = pts1.size();
    //以下是求解两组点的质心p1、p2
    for ( int i=0; i<N; i++ )
    {
        p1 += pts1[i];
        p2 += pts2[i];
    }
    p1 = Point3f( Vec3f(p1) /  N);
    p2 = Point3f( Vec3f(p2) / N);
	//以下是求解每个点的去质心坐标
    vector<Point3f>     q1 ( N ), q2 ( N ); // remove the center
    for ( int i=0; i<N; i++ )
    {
        q1[i] = pts1[i] - p1;
        q2[i] = pts2[i] - p2;
    }

    // compute q1*q2^T,也就是W矩阵
    Eigen::Matrix3d W = Eigen::Matrix3d::Zero();
    for ( int i=0; i<N; i++ )
    {
        W += Eigen::Vector3d ( q1[i].x, q1[i].y, q1[i].z ) * Eigen::Vector3d ( q2[i].x, q2[i].y, q2[i].z ).transpose();
    }
    cout<<"W="<<W<<endl;

    // SVD on W,求解SVD问题
    Eigen::JacobiSVD<Eigen::Matrix3d> svd ( W, Eigen::ComputeFullU|Eigen::ComputeFullV );
    Eigen::Matrix3d U = svd.matrixU();
    Eigen::Matrix3d V = svd.matrixV();
    
    if (U.determinant() * V.determinant() < 0)
	{
        for (int x = 0; x < 3; ++x)
        {
            U(x, 2) *= -1;
        }
	}
    
    cout<<"U="<<U<<endl;
    cout<<"V="<<V<<endl;
	//R
    Eigen::Matrix3d R_ = U* ( V.transpose() );
    //t
    Eigen::Vector3d t_ = Eigen::Vector3d ( p1.x, p1.y, p1.z ) - R_ * Eigen::Vector3d ( p2.x, p2.y, p2.z );

    // convert to cv::Mat
    R = ( Mat_<double> ( 3,3 ) <<
          R_ ( 0,0 ), R_ ( 0,1 ), R_ ( 0,2 ),
          R_ ( 1,0 ), R_ ( 1,1 ), R_ ( 1,2 ),
          R_ ( 2,0 ), R_ ( 2,1 ), R_ ( 2,2 )
        );
    t = ( Mat_<double> ( 3,1 ) << t_ ( 0,0 ), t_ ( 1,0 ), t_ ( 2,0 ) );
}

输出结果:

W=  10.871 -1.01948  2.54771
-2.16033  3.85307 -5.77742
 3.94738 -5.79979  9.62203
U=  0.558087  -0.829399 -0.0252034
 -0.428009  -0.313755   0.847565
  0.710878   0.462228   0.530093
V=  0.617887  -0.784771 -0.0484806
 -0.399894  -0.366747   0.839989
  0.676979   0.499631   0.540434
ICP via SVD results: 
R = [0.9969452351705237, 0.05983347594296956, -0.05020112774999552;
 -0.05932607556034199, 0.9981719680327529, 0.01153858709846614;
 0.05079975225724803, -0.008525103530305804, 0.998672472725868]
t = [0.1441598281917406;
 -0.06667849447794763;
 -0.03009747343724323]
R_inv = [0.9969452351705237, -0.05932607556034199, 0.05079975225724803;
 0.05983347594296956, 0.9981719680327529, -0.008525103530305804;
 -0.05020112774999552, 0.01153858709846614, 0.998672472725868]
t_inv = [-0.1461462830262246;
 0.05767443636940777;
 0.03806387978797219]

自定义顶点的G2O求解

注意在边的定义中给出了两种雅可比矩阵函数的定义方式,其实内容是一样的,只不过前一种用了Sophus的反对称矩阵函数与Eigen的单位阵函数。

//位姿类型为SE3
class VertexPose : public g2o::BaseVertex<6, Sophus::SE3> {
public:
  EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW;

  virtual void setToOriginImpl() override {
    _estimate = Sophus::SE3();
  }
//左乘扰动更新
  /// left multiplication on SE3
  virtual void oplusImpl(const double *update) override {
    Eigen::Matrix<double, 6, 1> update_eigen;
    update_eigen << update[0], update[1], update[2], update[3], update[4], update[5];
    _estimate = Sophus::SE3::exp(update_eigen) * _estimate;
  }

  virtual bool read(istream &in) override {}

  virtual bool write(ostream &out) const override {}
};

// g2o edge
class EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly : public g2o::BaseUnaryEdge<3, Eigen::Vector3d, VertexPose>
{
public:
    EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW;
    EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly( const Eigen::Vector3d& point ) : _point(point) {}

    virtual void computeError()
    {
        const VertexPose* pose = static_cast<const VertexPose*> ( _vertices[0] );
        // measurement is p, point is p'
        _error = _measurement - pose->estimate()* _point ;
    }

    virtual void linearizeOplus()
    {
        VertexPose* pose = static_cast<VertexPose *>(_vertices[0]);
        Sophus::SE3 T(pose->estimate());
        Eigen::Vector3d xyz_trans = T*_point;
        //第一种雅可比矩阵定义方式
        /*
        _jacobianOplusXi.block<3,3>(0,3) = Sophus::SO3::hat(xyz_trans);
        _jacobianOplusXi.block<3,3>(0,0) = -Eigen::Matrix3d::Identity();
        */
        
        //第二种雅可比矩阵定义方式
        double x = xyz_trans[0];
        double y = xyz_trans[1];
        double z = xyz_trans[2];

        _jacobianOplusXi(0,0) = -1;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,1) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,2) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,3) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,4) = -z;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,5) = y;

        _jacobianOplusXi(1,0) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,1) = -1;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,2) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,3) = z;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,4) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,5) = -x;

        _jacobianOplusXi(2,0) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,1) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,2) = -1;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,3) = -y;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,4) = x;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,5) = 0;
        
    }

    bool read ( istream& in ) {}
    bool write ( ostream& out ) const {}
protected:
    Eigen::Vector3d _point;
};
void bundleAdjustment (
    const vector< Point3f >& pts1,
    const vector< Point3f >& pts2,
    Mat& R, Mat& t )
{
    // 初始化g2o
    typedef g2o::BlockSolver< g2o::BlockSolverTraits<6,3> > Block;  // pose维度为 6, landmark 维度为 3
    Block::LinearSolverType* linearSolver = new g2o::LinearSolverEigen<Block::PoseMatrixType>(); // 线性方程求解器
    Block* solver_ptr = new Block( linearSolver );      // 矩阵块求解器
    g2o::OptimizationAlgorithmGaussNewton* solver = new g2o::OptimizationAlgorithmGaussNewton( solver_ptr );
    g2o::SparseOptimizer optimizer;
    optimizer.setAlgorithm( solver );

    // vertex
    VertexPose *pose = new VertexPose(); // camera pose
    pose->setId(0);
    pose->setEstimate(Sophus::SE3());
    optimizer.addVertex(pose);
    

      // edges
    for (size_t i = 0; i < pts1.size(); i++) {
    EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly *edge = new EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly(
      Eigen::Vector3d(pts2[i].x, pts2[i].y, pts2[i].z));
    edge->setVertex(0, pose);
    edge->setMeasurement(Eigen::Vector3d(
      pts1[i].x, pts1[i].y, pts1[i].z));
    edge->setInformation(Eigen::Matrix3d::Identity());
    optimizer.addEdge(edge);
  }

    chrono::steady_clock::time_point t1 = chrono::steady_clock::now();
    optimizer.setVerbose( true );
    optimizer.initializeOptimization();
    optimizer.optimize(5);
    chrono::steady_clock::time_point t2 = chrono::steady_clock::now();
    chrono::duration<double> time_used = chrono::duration_cast<chrono::duration<double>>(t2-t1);
    cout<<"optimization costs time: "<<time_used.count()<<" seconds."<<endl;

    cout<<endl<<"after optimization:"<<endl;
    cout<<"T="<<endl<<pose->estimate().matrix()<<endl;

}

输出结果:

calling bundle adjustment
iteration= 0	 chi2= 1.816115	 time= 0.000261961	 cumTime= 0.000261961	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
iteration= 1	 chi2= 1.815514	 time= 1.2887e-05	 cumTime= 0.000274848	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
iteration= 2	 chi2= 1.815514	 time= 6.8924e-05	 cumTime= 0.000343772	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
iteration= 3	 chi2= 1.815514	 time= 4.025e-05	 cumTime= 0.000384022	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
iteration= 4	 chi2= 1.815514	 time= 1.1597e-05	 cumTime= 0.000395619	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
optimization costs time: 0.000640925 seconds.

after optimization:
T=
  0.996945  0.0598335 -0.0502011    0.14416
-0.0593261   0.998172  0.0115386 -0.0666785
 0.0507998 -0.0085251   0.998672 -0.0300979
         0          0          0          1

采用G2O内置顶点的G2O求解

顶点采用g2o::VertexSE3Expmap类型,边由自己定义,细心点可以发现雅可比的计算函数与上文中的前三列与后三列对调了,这是由于位姿的类型变味了SE3quat引起的。

// g2o edge
class EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly : public g2o::BaseUnaryEdge<3, Eigen::Vector3d, g2o::VertexSE3Expmap>
{
public:
    EIGEN_MAKE_ALIGNED_OPERATOR_NEW;
    EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly( const Eigen::Vector3d& point ) : _point(point) {}

    virtual void computeError()
    {
        const g2o::VertexSE3Expmap* pose = static_cast<const g2o::VertexSE3Expmap*> ( _vertices[0] );
        // measurement is p, point is p'
        _error = _measurement - pose->estimate().map( _point );
    }

    virtual void linearizeOplus()
    {
        g2o::VertexSE3Expmap* pose = static_cast<g2o::VertexSE3Expmap *>(_vertices[0]);
        g2o::SE3Quat T(pose->estimate());
        Eigen::Vector3d xyz_trans = T.map(_point);
        
        _jacobianOplusXi.block<3,3>(0,0) = Sophus::SO3::hat(xyz_trans);
        _jacobianOplusXi.block<3,3>(0,3) = -Eigen::Matrix3d::Identity();
        
        /*
        double x = xyz_trans[0];
        double y = xyz_trans[1];
        double z = xyz_trans[2];

        _jacobianOplusXi(0,0) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,1) = -z;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,2) = y;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,3) = -1;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,4) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(0,5) = 0;

        _jacobianOplusXi(1,0) = z;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,1) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,2) = -x;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,3) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,4) = -1;
        _jacobianOplusXi(1,5) = 0;

        _jacobianOplusXi(2,0) = -y;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,1) = x;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,2) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,3) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,4) = 0;
        _jacobianOplusXi(2,5) = -1;
        */
    }

    bool read ( istream& in ) {}
    bool write ( ostream& out ) const {}
protected:
    Eigen::Vector3d _point;
};
void bundleAdjustment (
    const vector< Point3f >& pts1,
    const vector< Point3f >& pts2,
    Mat& R, Mat& t )
{
    // 初始化g2o
    typedef g2o::BlockSolver< g2o::BlockSolverTraits<6,3> > Block;  // pose维度为 6, landmark 维度为 3
    Block::LinearSolverType* linearSolver = new g2o::LinearSolverEigen<Block::PoseMatrixType>(); // 线性方程求解器
    Block* solver_ptr = new Block( linearSolver );      // 矩阵块求解器
    g2o::OptimizationAlgorithmGaussNewton* solver = new g2o::OptimizationAlgorithmGaussNewton( solver_ptr );
    g2o::SparseOptimizer optimizer;
    optimizer.setAlgorithm( solver );

    // vertex
    g2o::VertexSE3Expmap* pose = new g2o::VertexSE3Expmap(); // camera pose
    pose->setId(0);
    pose->setEstimate( g2o::SE3Quat(
        Eigen::Matrix3d::Identity(),
        Eigen::Vector3d( 0,0,0 )
    ) );
    optimizer.addVertex( pose );

    // edges
    int index = 1;
    vector<EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly*> edges;
    for ( size_t i=0; i<pts1.size(); i++ )
    {
        EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly* edge = new EdgeProjectXYZRGBDPoseOnly(
            Eigen::Vector3d(pts2[i].x, pts2[i].y, pts2[i].z) );
        edge->setId( index );
        edge->setVertex( 0, dynamic_cast<g2o::VertexSE3Expmap*> (pose) );
        edge->setMeasurement( Eigen::Vector3d(
            pts1[i].x, pts1[i].y, pts1[i].z) );
        edge->setInformation( Eigen::Matrix3d::Identity()*1e4 );
        optimizer.addEdge(edge);
        index++;
        edges.push_back(edge);
    }

    chrono::steady_clock::time_point t1 = chrono::steady_clock::now();
    optimizer.setVerbose( true );
    optimizer.initializeOptimization();
    optimizer.optimize(5);
    chrono::steady_clock::time_point t2 = chrono::steady_clock::now();
    chrono::duration<double> time_used = chrono::duration_cast<chrono::duration<double>>(t2-t1);
    cout<<"optimization costs time: "<<time_used.count()<<" seconds."<<endl;

    cout<<endl<<"after optimization:"<<endl;
    cout<<"T="<<endl<<Eigen::Isometry3d( pose->estimate() ).matrix()<<endl;

}

输出结果为:

calling bundle adjustment
iteration= 0	 chi2= 18161.146626	 time= 0.000122875	 cumTime= 0.000122875	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
iteration= 1	 chi2= 18155.141919	 time= 1.2375e-05	 cumTime= 0.00013525	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
iteration= 2	 chi2= 18155.140765	 time= 1.1205e-05	 cumTime= 0.000146455	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
iteration= 3	 chi2= 18155.140764	 time= 1.4397e-05	 cumTime= 0.000160852	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
iteration= 4	 chi2= 18155.140764	 time= 1.9675e-05	 cumTime= 0.000180527	 edges= 72	 schur= 0
optimization costs time: 0.00590094 seconds.

after optimization:
T=
  0.996945  0.0598335 -0.0502011    0.14416
-0.0593261   0.998172  0.0115386 -0.0666785
 0.0507998 -0.0085251   0.998672 -0.0300979
         0          0          0          1

CMakeLists.txt

这是和上一篇文章的cmake文件写到一起了:

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)
project(vo1)

set(CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE "Release")
add_definitions("-DENABLE_SSE")
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "-std=c++11 -O2 ${SSE_FLAGS} -g -march=native")
list(APPEND CMAKE_MODULE_PATH ${PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/cmake_modules)

find_package(OpenCV  REQUIRED)
find_package(Sophus REQUIRED)
find_package( G2O REQUIRED )
find_package( CSparse REQUIRED )


include_directories(
        ${OpenCV_INCLUDE_DIRS}
        ${Sophus_INCLUDE_DIRS}
        ${G2O_INCLUDE_DIRS}
        ${CSPARSE_INCLUDE_DIR}
        "/usr/include/eigen3/"
)


add_executable(pose_estimation_3d2d 3d2d.cpp)
target_link_libraries(pose_estimation_3d2d
        ${OpenCV_LIBS}
        ${Sophus_LIBRARIES})

        
add_executable( 3d2d_g2o 3d2d_g2o.cpp )


target_link_libraries( 3d2d_g2o 
   ${OpenCV_LIBS}
   ${CSPARSE_LIBRARY}
   ${Sophus_LIBRARIES}
   g2o_core g2o_stuff g2o_types_sba g2o_csparse_extension
)

add_executable( pose_estimation_3d3d pose_estimation_3d3d.cpp )
target_link_libraries( pose_estimation_3d3d 
   ${OpenCV_LIBS}
   ${Sophus_LIBRARIES}
   ${CSPARSE_LIBRARY}
   g2o_core g2o_stuff g2o_types_sba g2o_csparse_extension
)

add_executable( 3d3d 3d3d.cpp )
target_link_libraries( 3d3d 
   ${OpenCV_LIBS}
   ${Sophus_LIBRARIES}
   ${CSPARSE_LIBRARY}
   g2o_core g2o_stuff g2o_types_sba g2o_csparse_extension
)



头文件

#include <opencv2/highgui/highgui.hpp>
#include <opencv2/calib3d/calib3d.hpp>
#include <Eigen/Core>
#include <Eigen/Geometry>
#include <Eigen/SVD>
#include <g2o/core/base_vertex.h>
#include <g2o/core/base_unary_edge.h>
#include <g2o/core/block_solver.h>
#include <g2o/core/optimization_algorithm_gauss_newton.h>
#include <g2o/solvers/eigen/linear_solver_eigen.h>
#include <g2o/types/sba/types_six_dof_expmap.h>
#include <chrono>
#include "opencv2/imgcodecs/legacy/constants_c.h"
#include "sophus/se3.h"
#include "sophus/so3.h"

结果分析

分析结果可以发现,利用G2O只迭代一次后误差就基本不变了,也就是说算法一开始就已经收敛,所以可以把SVD(不经过迭代优化)得到的位姿值看为相机位姿的最优值。

版权声明:本文为博主原创文章,遵循 CC 4.0 BY-SA 版权协议,转载请附上原文出处链接和本声明。
本文链接:https://blog.csdn.net/weixin_52519143/article/details/126443857

3d-3d坐标 svd奇异值分解 icp迭代最近点 g2o优化 求解 求旋转平移矩阵 r t_ewenwanw的博客-爱代码爱编程

* 迭代最近点 Iterative Closest Point, ICP求解 3D坐标 到 3D坐标的转换矩阵(不用求解距离 激光SLAM 以及 RGB-D SLAM) * 使用 线性代数SVD奇异值分解 或者 非线性优化方法 求解 * 使用深度图将 平面图 转化成 3维点 * 特征点匹配 得到 * 三维点对 P={p1, p2, ... ,

视觉slam总结——orb slam2中关键知识点总结_leo-peng的博客-爱代码爱编程

视觉SLAM总结——ORB SLAM2中关键知识点总结 视觉SLAM总结——ORB SLAM2中关键知识点总结1. ORB SLAM2的总体框架是怎样的?2. ORB SLAM2是怎样完成初始化的?3. ORB SL

G2OBA优化及ICP的学习实践-爱代码爱编程

1.G2O 在之前的章节我已经讲过了G2O(General Graph Optimization)的相关原理以及应用,这次的BA优化问题呢,我们也可以转化为一个G2O来求解。 G2O(General Graph Optimization)———— 通用图优化。 G2O(General Graph Optimization)的核里带有种类多样的求解

视觉SLAM前端(间接法)——位姿求解(g2o)-爱代码爱编程

目录: 对极约束PnP问题ICP问题Gauss-Newton法g2o求解最小二乘问题对极约束 1.求解基础矩阵/本质矩阵 基础矩阵F Mat fundamental_matrix; fundamental_matrix = findFundamentalMat(points1, points2, FM_8POINT); 注意findFunda

视觉SLAM——2D-2D:对极几何-爱代码爱编程

一.实践:对极约束求解相机运动 slambook2/ch7/pose_estimation_2d2d.cpp #include <iostream> #include <opencv2/core/core.hpp> #include <opencv2/features2d/features2d.hpp> #inclu

SLAM练习题(十二)—— ICP(Iterative Closest Point)-爱代码爱编程

SLAM 学习笔记 文章目录 推导ICP求解ICP原理线性方法(SVD分解)非线性方法ICP实战代码总结 ICP全称Iterative Closest Point,翻译过来就是迭代最近点。ICP在点云配准领域应用的非常广泛,因此基于深度相机、激光雷达的算法使用ICP的频率比较高。 推导ICP 以下题目来自计算机视觉life

视觉SLAM十四讲学习笔记——第七讲 视觉里程计(2)-爱代码爱编程

        视觉SLAM的前端也就是视觉里程计实际上要解决的问题是根据匹配的特征点估计相机运动。根据不同的已知条件,选择不同的方法。 1.针对单目相机2D-2D:对极几何           对于单目相机,前后两幅图像之间存在着对极几何约束,我们掌握的信息只有两幅图像中特征点的图像坐标,因此相机运动估计问题变为以下两步: (1)根据匹配点坐

视觉SLAM十四讲学习笔记——第十三讲 实践:设计SLAM系统-爱代码爱编程

   1.如何运行示例代码         首先是如何运行示例代码,这里遇到了很多问题: (1)首先要下载Kitti数据集,并在config/default.yaml文件内修改路径。 (2)安装Glog、GTest、GFlags库,这部分比较简单,可能遇到的问题可以参考以下几个教程:                         Ubuntu 1

视觉SLAM十四讲学习笔记-第七讲-视觉里程计-ICP和实践-爱代码爱编程

   专栏汇总 视觉SLAM十四讲学习笔记-第一讲_goldqiu的博客-CSDN博客 视觉SLAM十四讲学习笔记-第二讲-初识SLAM_goldqiu的博客-CSDN博客 视觉SLAM十四讲学习笔记-第二讲-开发环境搭建_goldqiu的博客-CSDN博客 视觉SLAM十四讲学习笔记-第三讲-旋转矩阵和Eigen库_goldqiu的博客-CSDN

视觉SLAM十四讲——ch7-爱代码爱编程

视觉SLAM十四讲——ch7 ch7视觉里程计 本章目标: 1.理解图像特征点的意义,并掌握在单副图像中提取出特征点及多副图像中匹配特征点的方法2.理解对极几何的原理,利用对极几何的约束,恢复出图像之间的摄像机的三维运动3.理解PNP问题,以及利用已知三维结构与图像的对应关系求解摄像机的三维运动4.理解ICP问题,以及利用点云的匹配关系求解摄像机

视觉slam十四讲学习笔记——ch7视觉里程计1_视觉slam十四讲ch7-爱代码爱编程

文章目录 7 视觉里程计 17.1 特征点法7.2 实践:特征提取和匹配7.3 2D-3D:对极问题7.4实践: 对极约束求解相机运动7.5 三角测量7.6 实践:三角测量7.7 3D-2D: PnP7.7.1

[开源]超全icp实现,g2o,ceres,g-爱代码爱编程

最近在看高博的《视觉SLAM十四讲》的第6章,就做了一些小测试,整理了一下各种ICP实现方式,包括高斯牛顿法求解,SVD求解,ceres求解,g2o求解,还包含了一些开源库的测试,如icp,ndt,sicp,ndt_cpu等方法; 代码已经上传到github,如需下载请戳这里:源码(记得给我点个Star哈,嘿嘿) 关于SVD的求解方法,可以参考我上一篇